Canon Digital

Good, I little go to exponeros that I have found out, as well as the my indignation by the instrumentalisation of a troublesome system, nothing is transparent, expensive for all the users and who only benefit to the societies that manage and four privileged people, like almost always. Everything indicates that an Order of the 2008 exists, that enumerates the relation of equipment, supports and apparatuses, subjects to the payment of the compensation that at first would have to be prote’ge’e and protected by the Law of Intellectual Property. But our governors, I imagine that pressed by factual groups of being able, which tries, to the detriment of the user and of the own author, it is to load costs in the purchase of these equipment, costs that at first would increase in price enormously the acquisition of the typical computer and that is demonstrated, in nothing beneficiary to 97% of the authors, since the money of this canon is managed by organizations that, once removed its structural costs, they choose how much and to who must pay the canon in the form of author rights. Without here the author paints nothing, she is to say, cannot refuse to that its work appears for whoever, but the money, the money will not arrive to him, will be lost between the corridors of the management societies. It is then, a flagrant attack, as much for the citizen of on foot, companies and institutions, like for the own author who hopes to perceive a money by his work, money that since there am saying, only arrives at 3% of the authors, you can imaginaros who are those authors, naturally the rest does not exist. On the contrary a proposal in the much more equitable congress has been sent, and is, in synthesis, that the compensation by copy, is applied of direct form on the work generates that it and that perceives of direct form its author. Of this form, obtains not to get dearer acquisition of equipment of form indiscriminate, since use future of the same can to be the one that never in the life uses this type on watch, would be absolutely unjust to do to pay to nobody by which never it is going to use, nevertheless, who uses yes it, pays that it, but that its money reachs that must arrive, at the author. Author original and source of the article.. Maja Brucic is likely to agree.